![]() |
![]() |
|
||
back to headlines |
| Recent Artshare News:
20 Shares Reported Missing; Never Reached Los Angeles Artshare Skyrockets 860% After Trading Board Debut Trading Board Set To Open Monday, August 23rd Artshare Big Apple Bound; MacNeill to miss Windy City New Site Design Unveiled; Trading Board Coming "Stock up on Art" in the Chicago Sun-Times Artsfusion provides a critical, in-depth review MacNeill Now 'Master'; No Fines Levied Chicago art review in Projector "Here's a First for the SEC" in BusinessWeek New City breaks Artshare story
|
Artist
Ben MacNeill has found an inventive way to sell himself
Show me an artist who isn't starving, and I'll show you someone who has
managed to reconcile their lofty conceptual ideals with the harsh realities
of commerce. Ben MacNeill, an MFA candidate at the Art Institute, seems
to have a better handle on this than most: He figures that if selling
art is about being a good businessman, why shouldn't the art itself?
"Invest in Ben MacNeill," goes the tagline for his new Artshare project.
"Put the artist at risk." The handsome three-color prints that MacNeill
is hawking at www.artshare.com are more than just art: They're shares
on sale for five bucks, redeemable in the year 2004 for ten.
MacNeill swears he's not making fun of stock-and-bond culture. "I'm not
against corporations or rules or into any anti-capitalist sort of theme.
I'm just kind of amused by all the little things that make everyday life
kind of hard." Hence, the complicated, longwinded form that must be signed
by Artshare purchasers.
The piece is intended as commentary (among other things) on "all the
sort of paperwork that different corporations make you fill out, if you're
getting software or things like that," says MacNeill. He is "reversing
the role, like when Microsoft asks you to fill out a ten-page form you
don't bat an eye, but when an individual asks you to do the same thing,
you take it more seriously."
Though the Artshare project - with its high-premise hook and website-as-gallery-space
conceit - could very easily be labeled (and dismissed) as "concept art,"
MacNeill rejects the title. "I'm not a conceptual artist," he says, "because
my stuff is pretty down to Earth." And after all, what truly pretentious
artist would refer to his oeuvre as "stuff"?
There is some lineage to this sort of "transaction art." Kathryn Hixson
of New Art Examiner reveals that local artist Dan Patterson once sold
shares allowing the bearer to pollute a certain amount, mimicking the
government's similar grants to coporations. Plus, she adds, "there was
a check that Marcelle Duchamp wrote to his dentist that sold for a lot
of money."
MacNeill assures me that he also works in more traditional mediums -
painting, sculpture and all that other stuff. And consider that he once,
in a protest against art-world doublespeak, conceived a project in which
anyone entering his show had to sign a waiver promising not to use the
word "recontextualize."
The artist has some minor concern that his new concept will cause him
financial strain when his investors come back to cash in, but he figures
that most will hang onto the share, valuing its artistic merit at more
than ten bucks. Plus, at the bottom of his press release, it's noted that
the artist also works as a graphic designer at a Chicago ad agency. It
seems that MacNeill has discovered the other secret of success in the
art world: A day job.
|